missroserose: (Kick Back & Read)
What I've just finished reading

Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levine. I enjoyed the heck out of this one - the heroine's bravery, resourcefulness, and agency even as circumstances conspire to rob her of it are all delightful. That said, Ella's great strength as a character also becomes a significant handicap in the third act. Forced by her obedience-curse into the Cinderella role of servant, she spends a good amount of time chafing at her own passivity - and not much else happens. It feels like a missed opportunity; she could have spent some time learning more emotional maturity and alternate coping strategies to deal with her powerlessness, which would have given the finale more punch. But even as written, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it for a fun lighthearted read.

What I'm currently reading

Yoga Sequencing, by Mark Stephens. I had a bit of a rocky start with this one, but the second part of the first chapter was much more interesting. I particularly liked what it had to say about how we often think of poses as static, something we hold (an impression reinforced by photos in Yoga Journal or Instagram), when in fact our bodies are always moving - we breathe, our heart beats, electric signals travel along our nerves. I've been building my classes this week around the theme of dynamic stillness; finding the place in a pose where we feel the shape in our body and feel how it changes as we breathe and adjust to keep our balance.

Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal, by Christopher Moore. I have something of a love/hate relationship with Moore's work; like many humorists, he has a lot of sharply drawn observations on human nature and entertaining takes on our hypocrisy and foibles. However, I'm less of a fan of his attitude towards his characters; rather than evoking a sense of compassion for their shortcomings, he more often seems to be jabbing pointy things in their soft places and mocking them for their inability to live up to their ideals. (Maybe it's not surprising that many of my friends who share my perfectionist streak are big fans of his.) I'm a couple of chapters in and so far this one feels less condescending than some of his other books; maybe it's just that this is a story so often- and self-seriously-told that it's ripe for a little satire. Regardless, I'm enjoying his portrayal of Christ and Biff as Twain-esque boyhood troublemakers.

Symphony for the City of the Dead: Dimitri Shostakovich and the Siege of Leningrad, by M.T. Anderson. Oh man. If I didn't have a massage booking coming up fast I would go on about this book for paragraphs (and indeed already have, to several people). It's a good follow-up to Winter Garden, dealing with a lot of the same events from a more historical perspective, and it's turned out to be precisely the kind of survey of 20th-century Russian/Soviet history that I was hoping to find (and even better, through the lens of the art of the period, possibly my favorite type of history). I also love that Anderson spends some time critically examining his sources, and explaining why any given anecdote is suspect; the combination of the unreliability of Stalinist-era accounts (when saying the wrong thing could mean arrest, torture, and execution) and Shostakovich's global fame (which meant lots of people wanted to be associated with him) means that a lot of what we 'know' about his life has to be taken with a grain of salt. That said, his music speaks for him - and one of Anderson's great strengths as a writer is his ability to describe precisely what it is about the music that makes it so resonant. (I'm listening to the audiobook, which includes short clips of some of the pieces discussed, which is great - but I wish they were longer and that there were more of them!)

Moscow But Dreaming, by Ekaterina Sedia. Continuing my current reading kick, this is a series of short stories by a contemporary Russian author, many of which include fantastical elements. Even though they deal mostly with recent history and present-day Russia, there's a strong streak of sadness and pathos that runs through them. (It's almost like spending decades trapped between an insane and paranoid dictator bent on maintaining control at all costs and an insane dictator bent on the genocide of your people at all costs leaves a cultural mark, heh.) Many of them feel more like vignettes than traditional stories, portraits of people processing the emotions left by a traumatic past; but they're certainly evocative and haunting.

What I plan to read next

Pretty sure I have enough on my plate for now, but you never know...
missroserose: (Book Love)
Hello, book-friends! It's been an unusually busy few weeks. The past couple of years, I've observed that January's been a crowded month at the yoga studio (lots of New Year's resolutioners) but a slow month for massages. This made sense to me; January's when we city-dwellers who live in the midst of great shopping meccas all look at our credit card bills from the holidays and gasp and choke and resolve to live more frugally, and culturally we still see massages as a luxury rather than part of a regular physical maintenance plan. Weirdly, though, this January's bucked the trend, at least for my private bookings. This seems to be the confluence of a number of factors - I sold some gift certificates in December, the weather's been so cold and I'm running a special on hot stone massages, a lot of folks who've been to my classes or heard about me through the yoga grapevine are finally taking the time to book something (probably from residual holiday stress, haha). I'm certainly not complaining - Brian and I are heading to Tucson next month for his brother's wedding, and house-hunting shortly thereafter, so we can definitely use the extra income! - but it's been surprising to me.

What I've just finished reading

Winter Garden, by Kristin Hannah

I still feel like this book started about seven chapters too early - there just wasn't much that inspired me to invest emotionally in the present-day characters and their problems, so it was kind of a slog to get through. Once Anya gets going with her 'fairy tale', though...whoof. Her depiction of Stalinist Russia, and especially the Siege of Leningrad, is riveting - the hope and terror and small kindnesses and despair these people live through are all gut-wrenchingly immediate. Particularly effective was the way she tells the whole thing in present tense; we know how it shakes out because it's history to us, but to her it's her life, happening in the moment, and nobody knows the whole extent of it or when or how it will end. If there's one major complaint I have, it's that her tale outshines the framing story somewhat - there are a few moments where her interactions with her daughters feel superfluous, there only to give us a break from the difficulties of wartime Leningrad. But the author brings it all to a satisfying enough close, and at that point we're emotionally invested enough that the ending feels earned rather than pat. If nothing else, it definitely inspired me to read more about Russian history, so the experiment was a success on that front.

What I'm currently reading

Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levine. I've been reading this in snatches, on my Kindle in between appointments or in line at the coffeeshop, so I'm still only a third through. In the way of fairytale heroines, Ella's having a rough time of things, but is still determined to make the best of them as well as to exercise her agency. I'm particularly entertained at the story's use of her finishing school experience - I'd expected this to turn into a schoolgirl tale, but we spend barely a couple of chapters there before Ella's enforced obedience to all the orders drives her up the wall (although neatly, in the interim, solving her issues with clumsiness). She's off to find the fairy who 'gifted' her with obedience and demand that the spell be rescinded, and I'm cheering her on, even though I suspect said fairy will have her own ideas on the matter.

Yoga Sequencing: Designing Transformative Yoga Classes, by Mark Stephens. This book comes highly recommended by a lot of teachers I know, but I'm beginning to wonder if tackling it head-on was the wrong approach. After the introduction, it dumps you straight into...an entire chapter on yoga philosophy and metaphysical theory, including the five koshas (energetic bodies of consciousness) and the progression of a student's yoga practice in tapping into each of them. Which is, as y'all can probably guess, pretty much completely not my thing - I'm far more comfortable teaching to the paradigm of yoga-as-physical-practice than yoga-as-energetic/spiritual-quest. (Nothing against those who do, it's just not my experience.) Still, I'm looking at it like I did a lot of my college reading - the whole point of the endeavor is to expose myself to new ideas, and if it doesn't resonate with me I don't have to worry about retaining the knowledge past the test.

What I plan to read next

After reading Winter Garden, I remembered [personal profile] ivy's excellent review of Symphony for the City of the Dead: Dimitri Shostakovich and the Siege of Leningrad, so I picked that one up on Audible. I'm looking forward to listening to it!
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
What I've just finished reading

Ancillary Mercy, by Ann Leckie. A couple of years ago, Brian and I started watching Star Trek: The Next Generation via Netflix, and it occurred to me how fundamentally different it was from anything I'd seen on television over the past couple of decades; specifically, the way the Enterprise crew fundamentally assumed from the get-go that any aliens it encountered, no matter how powerful or strange, could be reasoned with - they might or might not hold the same values humanity did, but that there was always some common ground. Several of the best episodes ("Darmok" comes to mind, though there are others) centered on this idea, in fact. (I'm far from the first person to observe this about the show, but growing up watching primarily Star Trek spinoffs and very little other television, it never really struck me until then exactly how unusual that was. I remember, in fact, watching the new Battlestar Galactica in my twenties and thinking how much more appropriate it was, in a post-9/11 landscape, to have a sci-fi show that addressed the more distrustful aspects of humanity...and only realized some seasons later how depressing it got because it almost continually refused to acknowledge the flip side, perhaps because it was afraid of being compared to Star Trek.)

I bring this up because this series is one of the first that I've seen that does something different with the space opera formula. Even my beloved Vorkosigan series, delightful as it is, tends to have easily-identifiable characters and follow fairly standard plot arcs; this is hardly surprising, as tropes and archetypes are integral to our storytelling traditions. But the Ancillary books could almost entirely be summed up in this one line, from a recent installment of a different space opera franchise: "This is not going to go the way you think." And while lots of stories attempt to do what Leckie does here - subvert expectations, zig when you think it's going to zag, create fascinating characters and a meaty conflict with a satisfying resolution without a single Giant Space Battle - I've rarely seen it pulled off with such aplomb. It's not Star Wars-style space opera, about myth or the expectations that myth generates; it's not Star Trek either (the one alien race we have even tangential contact with, the Presger, are notable for precisely how alien they are - threatening not due to their desire for power or territory or resources, but because we can't even conceptualize of what they want). It's something completely its own, and refreshing, and so well-built that I can't quite believe it's over - the characters and their world still exist vividly in my head, long after I've put the book down.

What I'm currently reading

Winter Garden, by Kristin Hannah. I feel like this book started about ten chapters too early - I'm seven hours in to the audiobook and it's only just starting to really pique my interest. While I get what the author was doing - Nina and Meredith's mother is so completely closed-off that it takes their father's death, the frustration of Nina's career prospects, and the dissolution of Meredith's marriage in order to get them to the point where they're finally in a place to make the effort to get her to open up - it basically translated to six and a half hours of listening to "hey, these people have problems, and hey look, those problems are getting worse!" Which, now that I think about it, may well be preparing me to dive into some Russian history and literature, although perhaps not how I was intending it to. :P Still, I'm enjoying their mother's 'fairy tale', even if the contrivance feels--well--contrived; how is it not plainly obvious to both of these women that this is their mother's life story, thinly veiled?

Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levine. I've only read the first chapter or so, and I already like Ella - cursed with the 'virtue' of forced obedience, she develops a rebellious streak and finds creative ways to subvert it. I'm looking forward to this one, despite my general dislike of Clumsy Heroine Syndrome.

What I plan to read next

Might as well get a start on Yoga Sequencing, since I made it one of my New Year's goals. I haven't been journaling as much as I'd like to, either, so I think I'm going to go with the idea I had before - set aside the time to read a chapter each week, and journal about how I might apply it in my work.
missroserose: (Show Your Magic)
It sounds like a humblebrag, but really it's not - I haven't been doing reflective New Year's posts the past few years, in large part because my life is going pretty darn well. It's not that overall-positive years aren't worth reflecting on, but it feels a little like tempting fate - if I outline all the ways my life has gone well and how fortunate I've been, perhaps the deities of misfortune will see it and remember that they haven't got round to me yet. Silly, yes, but a very real feeling nonetheless. And that's not even taking into account the fact that many of my friends haven't been half so lucky, and probably aren't super into the idea of listening to me go on about my awesome life.

But I want to state, for the record, that - a couple of smaller-scale failures and misfortunes aside - I have been happy, and I'm well aware of how fortunate I am. I'm lucky enough to have two jobs that provide ample opportunities for both growth and rewarding moments. I'm lucky enough to have the kind of fiscal support that makes self-employment enjoyably challenging rather than stressful. I'm lucky enough to have a community of people who generally like me - as [personal profile] osprey_archer was mentioning, when you've never been a particularly popular person, it's surprising how great it is to walk into a place and have people be genuinely happy to see you. I'm lucky enough to have a supportive spouse I adore and live in a city I love in a country that remains a great experiment - inconclusive as yet, but worth fighting for nonetheless. I'm lucky enough to be in excellent physical health, in easily the best shape of my life. Most of all, perhaps, I'm lucky enough to have many interests and the time, opportunities, and supportive environment to explore them. And for all of this, I'm grateful.

I've never really been a big one for resolutions, but a post someone made on Facebook caught my eye, suggesting that, rather than make a general goal like "lose weight" or "read more", your resolutions be in the form of nine specific things: three things to read, three things to learn, and three things to do. So I think I'll break with my (non)tradition and set those goals.

To read:
--Yoga Sequencing. I don't feel I'm doing too badly just winging it, but I know I have so much room for improvement on this front.
--The Master & Margarita. I've heard from several people how excellent this book is, and I've been putting it off largely because I haven't felt I'd have the context for it. So I may need to brush up on Russian history first, but I will get to it this year. (It's not even that long a book!)
--Gentleman Jole & The Red Queen. I've been putting this one off because I know I'm going to love it and I know I can only read it for the first time once - but really, that's kind of a silly reason to not read it. Life is uncertain!

To learn:
--Some new massage techniques. This is rather vague, but it's going to happen regardless - I need to do some continuing education in preparation for my license renewal this year, so what I learn is probably going to depend on what opportunities I can find that fit into my schedule.
--To play "Same Old Lang Syne" on the piano. Simplistic? Maybe, but it'll take me a good amount of study to get there, so there's a fair amount of work implied here.
--More Swedish - specifically, more spoken Swedish. I'd like to get my spoken understanding up to where my written understanding currently is: enough that I can follow the gist of most conversations.

To do:
--Recruit some friends for karaoke. I've missed singing, and would like to do it more. Bonus if we can make it a semi-regular thing.
--Buy a house. Brian and I have been dip-toe-squealing about this for two years now, but this spring we're going to get pre-approved and start looking in earnest.
--Take guitar lessons at the Old Town School of Folk Music. I've been saying I want to do this since before we moved to Chicago. And I hear one of my friends is interested in doing the same, so I think I'll coordinate with her and see if we can't do it together.
missroserose: (After the Storm)
Hello, book-friends! Yesterday I went to Sculpt and then went out to karaoke with a friend who's in town for the holidays. It's been way too long since I karaoke'd, and last night I was reminded why - run-down bar, crappy sound system, loud drunk crowd. Not having many local karaoke-minded friends, I've just not had the motivation to hunt down a non-awful spot; still, the two of us had fun. And now I'm spending today recuperating...and also making arrangements for my brother-in-law's wedding in February, and coordinating family plans, and looking for coverage for my yoga classes while I'm gone, and responding to a prompt from the NYTimes Interpreter columnists, and hopefully making a playlist for class next week. I feel awfully busy for someone who's barely gotten off the couch!

What I've just finished reading

Bad Astronomy, by Philip Plait. The final section deals with debunking a lot of common conspiracy theories, generally by offering a point-by-point refutation of their arguments. Given that most of these are pretty ludicrous to anyone with basic scientific and astronomical knowledge (Velikovsky's wandering Venus theory was especially jaw-dropping to me), I find myself wondering if Plait isn't perpetuating precisely the problem he's trying to fight. Not that he doesn't do a good job refuting these points, but the issue isn't just that people believe one or the other of these theories, it's the whole mindset of "it's easier to believe what someone persuasive tells you than it is to think critically about it". I wonder if it wouldn't have been more effective if, rather than writing in an adversarial tone that comes off very much as "you should listen to what *I* say, not what *they* say", Plait had used these theories as examples and guided the reader through the various steps of critical consideration.

What I'm currently reading

Ancillary Mercy, by Ann Leckie. This is really turning into one of my favorite kinds of space operas, where there's lots of speculation about new technology and the effects it has on society, but that speculation is placed firmly in the context of immediate, identifiable characters who have to deal with the fallout on a personal level. Specifically, I found Breq's mulling on how they'd (unintentionally) treated the AIs in their life with the same disregard that they so strongly disliked when they were an AI themselves particularly poignant; it's so dang easy to fall into that kind of hypocrisy, especially when you're trying to change a social norm that's so firmly entrenched as to not even be questioned by most poeple. And it's a long and tough bit of processing to acknowledge that behavior, resist the temptation to rationalize and justify, and resolve to do better. The fact that Breq does it while pulling off a particularly 80s-lone-hero bit of long-shot sci-fi action makes it especially entertaining to me. Way to multitask, there, Breq!

Winter Garden, by Kristin Hannah. This is not at all my usual jam (contemporary family drama novel), but it popped up as a sale on Audible and the premise (grown women trying to reconnect with their emotionally-distant mother who grew up in Stalinist Russia through fairy tales that seem to be pretty obvious metaphors for her experinces) sounded moderately interesting; perhaps slightly more so now because I've been haphazardly trying to fill in the gaps of my knowledge of 20th-century Russian history. So far there's been little of that, but I'm still only really in the setup; the author's depictions of a family dealing with the death of their one universally-beloved member have so far been...prosaic. Not ineffective, but nothing that's really hooked my emotions or made me pause the audiobook and go back. We'll see how the next bit goes.

What I plan to read next

Still up in the air, although Goodreads helpfully sent me several emails this week highlighting Kindle deals on books that I've been meaning to read; I now have Ella Enchanted, Hidden Figures, and Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal waiting for me there. Whooo knows which one I'll read first? *waggly mysterious fingers*
missroserose: (Freedom on a Bike)
Hello, book-friends! We've had some warmer weather this week, so I've been biking to work and on errands the past couple of days - and woke up so physically exhausted that I skipped Sculpt this morning. (It's almost like biking 12.4 miles in two days is a lot when you're not doing it regularly, heh.) So today I'm catching up on this year's Julkalendern, the Swedish holiday TV show where they release one 12-minute episode each day until Christmas. My reading comprehension has grown significantly since last year; I have enough grasp of the structure/syntax that I can pick up unfamiliar words from context, so I only have to pause the show to look something up a couple of times an episode. My spoken comprehension, though, is still pretty crap, so I continue to be grateful for the Swedish subtitles. As to the show itself, it's cute - sort of a Doctor-Who inspired low-budget sci-fi romp, and definitely better on the diversity front than last year's Entirely Blonde And Swedish cast - but I'm not quite enjoying it as much as last year's steampunk/fantasy adventure, in part because it doesn't have anything akin to the delightful friendship between determined young Selma and manic-depressive mad-scientist Efraim von Trippelhatt to give it an emotional center. But there's still sixteen episodes to go, so that may change.

What I've just finished reading

Ancillary Sword, by Ann Leckie. I've already written up most of my thoughts on this one; it does end up feeling a little bit like an interstitial episode, though we'll see how much of it turns out to be setup for the final chapter. Even if the answer is "none", however, I like these characters and the universe and Ann Leckie's writing enough that it was well worth the time.

What I'm currently reading

Ancillary Mercy, though only just - I've barely read the first chapter. Definitely anticipating this one, though - I decided not to wait and space it out like I did the first two, even though I usually try to savor the series I like best. (Only three Vorkosigan books left! *sadface*)

Bad Astronomy, by Philip Plait. I've had this in my Audible library for a while (I think Brian or I picked it up on sale), and I figured I'd give it a listen while wrapping packages and whatnot. It's well written, but very basic; most of the information I remember from my high-school astronomy course, although I was surprised how much of it had gotten muddled with various common-knowledge misconceptions. So not a bad refresher course, but definitely aimed at a not-particularly-scientifically-literate audience. Which, sadly, means most of America.

What I plan to read next

[personal profile] cyrano reminded me that I've still got the rest of the Wrinkle in Time series to read, including the one I've never read before. Also, really looking at my bookshelves for the first time in some weeks, I seriously need to winnow them down, and possibly buy another one...though God knows where I'll put it.
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
Hello, book friends! I have presents to wrap and cards to write, as soon as I'm back from teaching this morning's class. So let's get this done!

What I've just finished reading

The Price of Meat, by K.J. Charles. Absolutely what it says on the tin - a Victorian style penny dreadful/horror story. I get the feeling Charles is playing with a setting that may feature in some of her future work - the liberty of Alsatia, a lawless area in the midst of London where criminals flee as a last resort, ruled by iron-fisted blackguards who dole out food from positively Swiftian sources, certainly holds a lot of potential for horror. (Point of note for anyone who hadn't figured as much from the clear Sweeney Todd references: this is definitely not a novella to read while you're having lunch.) If this particular story has a weakness it's that Johanna seems largely unchanged by her experience; she's a pretty pragmatic and levelheaded sort to begin with, so her katabasis into this criminal underworld and subsequent shock and horror is definitely effective, but I feel like we could've used another scene between her and Bella to really see how it's haunted her. That said, the detective inspector's arc was surprisingly touching and effective.

What I'm currently reading

Ancillary Sword, by Ann Leckie. For all of Breq's broadening of experience, the scope of this volume is turning out to be somewhat more limited than I expected; the relatively domestic issues with Citizen Fosyf and her daughter Raughd and their systemic mistreatment of plantation workers, while certainly handled well, seems a little more like a filler Star Trek episode. Not a bad one! There's definitely a lot of good points here about social inequality, appearance vs. reality of social mobility, and what happens when a culture is conquered by a larger/more powerful one but refuses to be absorbed. ([personal profile] asakiyume, I can see why you liked this one so much.) Just, from where I'm at now (roughly 2/3rds through), it feels like we're going to have a Lesson of the Week and then wrap this up with a more or less reset to the status quo. I suspect it'll be a little more than that, at least; we still have the major arc of Anaander Mianaai and her feuding selves to resolve. And I wouldn't be surprised at all if Leckie manages to make this (relative) microcosm of a story symbolic of the greater conflict; the personal *is* political, etc.

Also, I want to extend special props to Leckie's cleverness with Raughd in particular. Given that 90% of the book is written as a translation of a language where gender isn't specified, we've gotten used at this point to looking for clues either in-text (some characters are referred to as having facial hair, for instance) or in behavioral coding (Awn, while never set as a specific gender, codes heavily female through her caring for her crew and the people of the planet she's assigned to occupy). I was entertained at how Raughd's effete behavior, abuse of power, and utilization of social advantage to cover up cruelty all coded heavily as masculine...only to find out later, with characters speaking a different language, that Raughd was in fact female. Women can be just as abusive as men, provided the right proclivities, socialization, and opportunities!

What I plan to read next

Completely unsure! But then, I'm not sure if I'm going to have any time to read over the next few weeks, haha.
missroserose: (Christmas Picard)
Hello, book-friends! Much of the past week and a half, in amidst classes and work and social engagements and massage bookings, has been spent trying to set up our Christmas tree. Short version, it's a quite-well-made and also huge (nine feet tall, five across at the base) artificial tree that came pre-lit with incandescent bulbs; sadly, the bulbs were nowhere near as well made as the tree, and in addition to being obscenely expensive to light, after ten years of use over half the strings weren't lighting. We spent a few days trying everything we could think of (replacing bulbs, replacing fuses, even rewiring a few parts) to fix the built-in lights, with no luck...so it was either time to buy a new tree, or strip the old lights off and re-wire it with new lights. Since we're hoping to buy a place in the spring, we decided the latter made more sense - it'd kind of suck to have a brand-new tree and discover it didn't fit in the new home. Advantages: we can put on LED lights, so no more three-figure power bills in December; we can continue to use the tree for the next ten years instead of giving it away/throwing it out. (Most of the 'needles' are made of PVC, which is fantastically toxic in landfills.) Disadvantages: I'm pretty sure we're spending as much as a new tree would cost for the lights (no one ever said being environmentally friendly was cheap); I vastly underestimated how many lights it would take and had to run to multiple Home Depots all over Chicago yesterday trying to find enough to finish the job; the amount of time it's taking has basically turned it into a second (or third, in my case) job. But! It's over half lit now (insert holiday booze joke here) and with any luck, by Saturday we'll have a properly-decorated tree!

What I've just finished reading

Too Like The Lightning, by Ada Palmer. (Stripping lights off a nine-foot tree gives one a lot of time to listen to audiobooks, heh.) I have mixed feelings on this story. It's certainly one of the most ambitious and intelligent books I've read lately, but I'm hesitant to call it a novel; it's clearly meant in the style of its Enlightenment forebears, where the worldbuilding and the plot (such as it is) serves entirely to set up numerous philosophical debates. Once I realized that and stopped trying to follow the thread of the story so closely, I enjoyed it much more; if you're looking for a ripping future-political thriller, this is not it. But if you're interested in Enlightenment-era European history, humanism, philosophy, ethics, the duality of human nature, etc., etc., and especially if you're fond of Neal Stephenson, you might give this one a go.

What I'm currently reading

The Price of Meat, by KJ Charles. Charles is branching out a bit here from her usual period/supernatural gay romance into a proper Victorian penny dreadful story, and I love the first line: "In the time of England's steep decline, when Victor II sprawled on the throne and lost colonies as carelessly as a child loses toys, there stood a number of institutions that should never have been permitted to exist." I think it was Ann Leckie who said in an interview that if every scene in a novel has to serve two purposes, every sentence in a novella has to serve at least three; I just love how Charles sets up the basics of the alternate timeline, the tone of the story, and one of the fundamental conflicts all at once. I've only read the first bit, but I'm looking forward to the rest.

Ancillary Sword, by Ann Leckie. Finally! I'm a little surprised to look at my bookmark and realize that I'm almost halfway through this book; I feel like I've had so little time to read this past week. But I'll be damned if I'm not finding this story just as absorbing as the first, even if it lacks the clear drive of the "REVENGE!" plot of the first book. Breq has gone from a very singleminded, action-driven quest to a very open-ended, human-based one - and, unsurprisingly, their typical direct approach is singularly unsuited for success. Brian pointed out that, in a very real way, the first book was about a shrinking of perspective - Breq going from being part of a nearly omniscient collective, the starship Justice of Toren, to being a single being bent on a single purpose - whereas this book is a re-broadening, with Breq having to figure out how to connect with the people around them as well as how to engage with someone important to them who's outright hostile to their overtures.

What I plan to read next

I have the new Rat Queens and Sex Criminals trade paperbacks sitting on the coffeetable...we'll see!
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
What I've just finished reading

Zer0es, by Chuck Wendig. This is categorized as a thriller, and that's not inaccurate, but I'll be damned if Wendig's background as a supernatural horror writer doesn't show through in spades - once Typhon is out of the box and running wild, there are some horrific sequences involving body horror and computer-assisted zombifying. ([personal profile] ivy, in retrospect, our discussion about whether it'd drive you nuts due to the tech issues is sort of beside the point - the tech is pretty solid right up until it hits supernatural-horror land, but the latter is vivid enough that I'd recommend you skip it.) Story-wise, it clips along pretty well, but (also true to the author's horror background) the ending feels more than a little ragged and unfinished. A couple of the main characters feel like they got shortchanged on their arcs, and more than a few plot threads seem to just get...left dangling. It's kind of a bummer, because (supernatural horror aside) I really enjoyed a lot of this, but it doesn't quite stick the landing like it should.

Norse Mythology, by Neil Gaiman. I was...both satisfied and not by this recounting. It's a high-quality reweaving of the scattered myths that have survived to the present day, and it does a good job setting them in sequence and giving an idea of what might be missing. But in a very real way, all that effort only highlights how much is missing. Gaiman does his best to acknowledge these gaps in the narrative and smooth them over ("Kvasir, wisest of the gods, walked in through the first door. Once he had been dead, and mead had been brewed from his blood, but now he was alive once more"), and it works well enough, but the part of me that values narrative rebels at feeling like it's been handed a book with two-thirds of the pages missing. Some part of me wonders if it wouldn't have been a better book if he hadn't woven the myths in together with inventions of his own - he's certainly familiar enough with the stories and the culture to create a convincing return of Kvasir, or a story or two of Freya. I'm sure people would've complained that he was adding his own material, but frankly, that feels more in the oral tradition of these stories than leaving them so patchy and incomplete; one of the first things I learned about public speaking is that if you forget what you were going to say, make something up. It's the flow that matters as much as the content.

What I'm currently reading

Too Like the Lightning, by Ada Palmer. I'm beginning to feel like audiobook was either exactly the wrong format for this book, or exactly the right one. I'm mostly following along with the characters and the worldbuilding, but there's just so much of it, sometimes in fairly info-dump-y segments; additionally, it reads very much like the author's depending on the reader's knowledge of history to help connect the dots. I'm not historically illiterate by any means, but like most autodidacts, I have significant gaps in my knowledge, so there are times I'm flailing a bit. On the other hand, the worldbuilding and even the narrative seem to exist entirely for the purpose of philosophical and ethical discussion, something I'm very much at my ease in, so I'm not entirely lost...still, much as with the lone Neal Stephenson book I've read, I'm glad I have it in audiobook so I'm not sitting there wondering when the plot's going to pick up again.

What I plan to read next

Finally, I can pick up Ancillary Sword! As soon as I have a spare moment in the Sculpt-biking-yoga-cleaning-decorating-socializing-music-shows-bookings whirl, heh.
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
Taking a moment in between the mad dash of airport-fetching, grocery shopping, pie making, and traffic-navigating and banging this out before it's time for work-going. So glad I'm not the one doing all the cooking tomorrow, heh.

What I just finished reading

My Brilliant Friend, by Elena Ferrante. This was a well-written and thoroughly engaging portrait of two girls growing up in a poor neighborhood in midcentury Naples, and...that's really as much as I have to say about it. My earlier complaints still stand; there's a distinct sense of hopelessness that overshadows the whole thing and makes it less interesting than I think it wants to be. I'm not saying it's not accurate - there are many environmental, social, biological, and psychological reasons why it's difficult to escape poverty. But the end-point especially - which, without going into detail, demonstrates pretty vividly to Lila that the bargain she's made to elevate herself above particular dangers won't, in fact, protect her from those dangers at all - kinda made me shrug and go "Well, that sucks." Again, presumably there's more to these girls' stories, but with the exception of a few scenes - the unusually tender and sexually loaded scene where Elena bathes Lila prior to her wedding, and which gives the book's title its ironic edge, is a standout - it mostly reads as a story of not-particularly-likable people being moderately awful to each other. Which, again, may well be true to the setting, but it feels hopeless enough that I'm not particularly interested in reading the next book.

What I'm currently reading

Zer0es, by Chuck Wendig. Our pod of wannabe hackers have been given several assignments now and are starting to connect the dots, and although the greater pattern still lies out of reach, the overall tone is ominous - all the more so for several seemingly-unrelated but disquieting events that the narrative serves to us. As an aside, I'm completely entertained at how immediately Hollis Copper, the federal agent assigned to babysit our group, codes in my head as "Idris Elba as Stacker Pentecost in Pacific Rim". I don't even remember if Copper is described as African-American, but something about his ironclad discipline, world-weary attitude and somewhat-compromised principles just translate 100% to that picture in my head.

Norse Mythology, by Neil Gaiman. Welp, it wouldn't be proper Norse legends without the wise and charismatic poet being drained of their blood by dark elves intent on creating the Mead of Poets, I suppose. (In fairness, the reader is not unwarned: "It is a long story, and it does no credit to anyone: there is murder in it, and trickery, lies and foolishness, seduction and pursuit. Listen." I genuinely don't know how much of that to credit to the Prose Edda and how much to Gaiman, but it's possibly the most poetic trigger warning I've come across.) I'm also enjoying the relationship Loki holds to the rest of the gods, as an outsider and malicious trickster; they hate him but also need him to get them out of various scrapes (often that he got them into in the first place). It's nicely representative of that aspect of human nature..."This is a terrible idea! But what if it works?" "...nope, that was a terrible idea! But we can fix it and still come out ahead if we..."

Too Like the Lightning, by Ada Palmer. This is an incredibly intricate and elaborate future world Palmer's created, with significant differences in gender and religion and status markers and social unit and language and criminal justice and technology...and while there's certainly some kind of conspiracy plot afoot, mostly we're spending an awful lot of time in dialogue with the various characters, often having philosophical debates on various points. There's a bit about a kid with possible supernatural powers, and a possible global conspiracy happening, and...I don't know if it's all going to come together and feel more coherent by the end or not, but for now I'm enjoying the ride, almost certainly in part due to it being an audiobook.

What I plan to read next

Still planning on Ancillary Sword! I have to finish Norse Mythology first, though, since it's a paper book, and I just haven't had a lot of time to sit and read paper books lately.
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
It's been a week. Not as physically intense as last week, but I've been feeling even more tired; I suspect I'm fighting off another cold. Hurrah, wintertime in a cold damp crowded city. :P Given how many moving parts my schedule has, I'll take "tired but still functioning" over "full-blown sick for a week and out of it for another week" any day...which doesn't mean I don't hope I'm feeling better tomorrow. It'd be nice to be able to clean the house properly without running out of steam halfway through.

What I've just finished reading

My Cousin Rachel, by Daphne du Maurier. I'm a little torn on the ending (er, spoiler warning? It was written in the 1920s...and it's a gothic novel, so it's pretty heavily foreshadowed); read one way, it comes across very much as "uppity womenfolk who refuse to adhere to social norms get what's coming to them", but I think there's an equal argument to be made for the "overly restrictive societies are toxic to those who would transcend them, and therefore the tragedy isn't that she didn't fit in but that Philip couldn't grow out of his narrow-minded upbringing and appreciate her for who she was - and since this culture gives men all the power, she was ultimately the one who suffered" view. Appropriately enough for the genre, the intent is left ambiguous, although I suspect my preferred reading is somewhat less so.

Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones. Much as with the movie, I admired parts of this story very much, but the whole just...didn't quite gel. The whole thing felt scattered, with individual scenes working quite well but not really quite hanging together. I've been thinking about it on and off for weeks, and ultimately I think what's missing is any kind of emotional anchor. To paraphrase Desire, ever story ever told is about somebody wanting something, and here I just don't feel that wanting from...any of the characters, really. Even after her transformation and undertaking her quest, Sophie seems mostly complacent, and Howl of course has made a career out of not facing his feelings. Some of he worldbuilding is similarly patchy, but that's frankly small potatoes compared to the lack of clarity in character motivation; without it, we're left with a couple of people who...do various things, because maybe they think they'd like to, or maybe it's better than whatever else they could do, but there's not really any urgency or particularly high stakes involved.

Norse Mythology, by Robert Carlson. Somehow this ended up on my Kindle - I probably picked it up on the cheap because I was looking for an overview - and it turned out to be a quick read, basically a longish blog post. I did appreciate that it included links to further reading, including the Poetic and Prose Eddas (our sole source for many of these myths, as they were transmitted almost entirely in the oral tradition for much of their lifespan and only written down piecemeal, by people dedicated to preserving them when Christianity had mostly overtaken the culture). It doesn't get into a lot of the individual myths, but the background is useful; I'd wondered for a while why most of the Norse myths seem to be about Odin/Loki/Thor (answer: we know there were stories about the other gods because the Eddas refer to them, but they've been lost over the centuries).

What I'm currently reading

Norse Mythology, by Neil Gaiman. Creation myths fascinate me. The cultures that tell them are so diverse, but there are so many parallels - flood myths, the melding of elements, the creation of people out of earthly materials by divine beings who may or may not have known what they were doing. You really start to see where Jung got his ideas about archetypes and the collective unconscious.

Zer0es, by Chuck Wendig. Our titular hackers - a social engineer and rabble-rouser, an Arab Spring hacktivist, a hardcore libertarian Vietnam vet cipherpunk, and a full-on troll - have been accosted by a Shadowy Government Agent and deposited at The Lodge, there to perform unspecified acts of computer wizardry for the government in exchange for clean records. Said Government Agent has mentioned to his boss that they seem of...less than stellar quality, to which the boss has replied that they were hand-picked (so to speak) by a computer algorithm referred to as Typhon. Given that Typhon was the name of one of the scariest and most deadly monsters in Greek literature, I'm sure this is going to go just fine and our (not-quite-) heroes will do their jobs and get to go home with no trouble at all.

My Brilliant Friend, by Elena Ferrante. I'm not enjoying this story as much as I'd like to, and it took me a while to figure out why. There's a strong streak of crab mentality amongst the characters; the two main characters are both extremely gifted, but when they display their gifts they're mocked and belittled for it by their peers. Even social climbing of a more acceptable sort - Lila, at seventeen, works out a marriage arrangement that lifts her family out of poverty and provides opportunities for her father and brother to start their own business - is disparaged, with several of her friends referring to her 'selling herself'. (Which, okay, that's not an unfair assessment, but what alternative do you propose?) The narrator continues to study in school with some effort (and to Lila's envy), but sees no real future for herself and her knowledge; neither of them seem to have much in the way of long-term goals. While this certainly feels like an accurate portrayal of how poverty affects your mentality, it's honestly kind of depressing to listen to.

What I plan to read next

Ancillary Sword. I really want to find out what Breq does next.
missroserose: (Kick Back & Read)
This week has been strange - half the time it's felt like it's going by incredibly slowly, the other half it's been like "wait, it's Wednesday already?" I feel like I've been falling behind on my personal stuff (letters, reading, music practice); that's usually a sign that I'm either anxious about something (which is eating my mental cycles) or physically overstretched (no pun intended). I suspect in this case it's a little of column A, a little of column B - I've been having some work frustrations that really deserve their own entry, and my massage bookings picked up this week. Luckily I only have one class to teach tomorrrow and can rest for the remainder of the day.

What I've just finished reading

Unfortunately, nothing - that's been part of the falling-behind. I'm nearly done with My Cousin Rachel, though.

What I'm currently reading

My Cousin Rachel, by Daphne du Maurier. I'm enjoying the subtlety in this novel. There are a lot of unstated but strongly present themes regarding the toxicity of gender roles and rigid class distinctions; I really love how du Maurier's used the perspective of various characters to present the differing facets of Rachel's character, and how well Rachel has resisted being put into any of the pigeonholes so clearly made up for her. She's not an innocent being manipulated by an unscrupulous friend, nor a con woman out to steal the estate, nor a long-exiled Englishwoman returning to fulfill her rightful role as aristocrat, nor a heroine, nor a villain. She's a woman with her own life and her own agenda who has never pretended to be anything else, and (unless there's some kind of Big Dramatic Reveal in the last twenty pages) most of the suffering she's caused has been due to other people expecting her to fulfill whatever role they've designated for her. Kendall says that there are women who, through no fault of their own, bring disaster down wherever they go; what remains unstated is that the disaster stems from their refusal to fit into whatever pattern has been socially mapped for them, and their power (be it through money or charisma or both) to maintain that refusal even in the face of others' expectations. Which says far more about the limited roles for women in rural England of the time than it does about the women involved.

My Brilliant Friend, by Elena Ferrante. Speaking of toxic gender roles...Elena and Lila are well past puberty now, and getting attention from many of the boys (and men) in the neighborhood - some welcome, a lot of it not. Particularly poignant is a sequence where Elena gets the opportunity to go on holiday with a friend of her teacher's, and spends a couple of months in an environment that's far more loving and supportive and affectionate than anything she's ever experienced before...only to discover that the adults in this environment harbor danger of a different sort. Which, I suppose, is the fundamental betrayal of teenagerhood, but man, that's a particularly rough way to learn it, even if she does escape mostly unscathed.

What I plan to read next

Nothing's calling to me at the moment, probably because of how buried I feel. Time to finish a few things and then see!
missroserose: (Joy of Reading)
Hello, book-friends! Yesterday my schedule was booked back-to-back from eleven to ten - massage trade, massage client, then two classes, with just enough time in between to grab a bite or a break. It all went beautifully, but with the requisite house cleaning for hosting clients I had time to either write my book blog or practice piano, and piano won. (Still a little shaky on the body mechanics, but I managed to work out the entire opening of "Let It Be" from the music, rather than by ear! I'm super proud of myself. Also, much as with Beatles songs on guitar, there are a lot of octave-long reaches. Oh, John Lennon and your beautiful elegant piano-player hands.)

What I've just finished reading

Nothing this week - partly due to busy-ness, partly to splitting my reading time between three formats. I usually have a paper book, and ebook, and an audiobook going at any given time, and this week my schedule's been scattered enough that I've been doing some of each.

What I'm currently reading

My Cousin Rachel, by Daphne du Maurier. I'm maybe a fifth of the way through, but this is shaping up to be just as excellent a fall read as promised - properly gothic, with an atmosphere of melancholy and dread that hints at a lack of reliability in the narrator. Something that occurs to me - while "gothic fiction" brings up a lot of associations, including rainy English moors and haunted manor houses, one of the most pervasive expectations is that the prose will be overwrought and flowery. du Maurier is something of an exception on that front; she does use the longish sentences and occasional archaic construction of gothic fiction (not inappropriate to the way people, especially people from her narrator's background, tend to think), but her word choices are fairly workaday - which in itself sets up a certain tension. For instance:

My first instinct, on climbing from the coach in Florence, as the dusty baggage was unloaded and carried within the hostelry, was to cross the cobbled street and stand beside the river. I was travel-stained and weary, covered from head to foot with dust. For the past two days I had sat beside the driver rather than die from suffocation within, and like the poor beasts upon the road I longed for water. There it was before me. Not the blue estuary of home, rippling, and salty fresh, whipped with sea spray, but a slow-moving turgid stream, brown like the river bed beneath it, oozing and sucking its way under the arches of the bridge, and ever and again its flat smooth surface breaking into bubbles. Waste matter was borne away upon this river, wisps of straw, and vegetation, yet to my imagination, fevered almost with fatigue and thirst, it was something to be tasted, swallowed, poured down the throat as one might pour a draught of poison.

Guilty pleasure reading, maybe, but I'm finding it thoroughly pleasurable.

Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones. Really enjoying how this book makes explicit the character relationships that're hinted at in the film but never really explored. Arguably they don't need to be - show don't tell, etc. - but something about the film's portrayal never quite meshed for me; we never get any idea why Howl is so immature and incapable of confrontation, or why Michael puts up with him, or why Sophie has such a complacent streak. The book doesn't spend a lot of time on it, but it does give you enough that the characters feel far more fully developed. Although I'm happy to have Miyazaki's beautiful visuals in my head as I read it.

My Brilliant Friend, by Elena Ferrante. Lila and Elena have hit puberty, and oh! the drama! Elena, with Lila's help, has turned out to be a dedicated student and is studying Greek and Latin in high school with the rich children, but Lila (not having the family resources to attend school even with the help of the teacher) is educating herself through library books and working in her parents' shoe shop. Furthermore, Lila developed later but is clearly going to be a great beauty, leaving poor Elena (whose sole consolation for the past couple of years has been her possession of breasts) feeling even more inadequate. What's probably most heartbreaking is that it's clear that Lila is just as jealous of Elena as Elena is of her, but of course could never acknowledge it and risk her sense of superiority. It's always tragic when our insecurities get in the way of actually connecting with the people we profess to care about.

What I'm planning to read next

After three days of Googling, I finally found the illustrated ballet storybook I had in childhood, and ordered a copy - somewhat battered (it is from 1962) but intact, and with the lovely illustrations I remember. Perhaps I'll pass it on to my goddaughter if she turns out to be interested in ballet.
missroserose: Backlit hands playing piano. (A Little Light Piano)
It is, indeed, a chilly fall day, and I am cozy on the couch with cats, one or the other of which has been occupying my lap pretty much continuously. A big fuzzy blanket and the sun coming through the front windows also contributes to my cozy-ness...which I will shortly be discarding, because two of my favorite teachers are doing a Harry Potter themed yoga class at noon. There will be dueling! (Actually partnered yoga sequences.) With wands! (Actually glowsticks.) I just wish I had some appropriately-colored yoga clothes...hrm. I suppose I do have a set of blue leggings. Maybe I can wear some silver jewelry. (Yes, I'm a Ravenclaw. Given the opportunity of learn-a-situation-by-jumping-in versus learn-by-researching-and-assessing, I will pick the research-and-assess route every time. But I have lots of Gryffindor friends who'll be happy to jump in and save whatever needs saving while I'm busy figuring out what the ideal outcome is and how best to make it happen.)

Brian is back from his latest trip. He's been doing a lot of travel for business over the past couple of months, most recently to London; while he enjoyed that trip especially (he'd been there once as a poor college student and loved it but hadn't been back in over a decade) he's glad to be home. At my request, he brought me a British paperback of My Cousin Rachel, because fall is prime Daphne du Maurier reading season. He also snagged a pretty excellent bottle of non-export Scotch at the duty free shop; we're going to have to have some friends over to enjoy it.

Friday was my first piano lesson, where I learned all the things I've been doing wrong body-mechanics-wise. Luckily, working in two other fields where postural awareness is a big deal, I'm not finding it too difficult to make changes; as with most musical basics, it's now just a matter of doing it enough times that it becomes muscle memory rather than yet another thing to juggle consciously. I'm also seriously considering getting a music theory cheat poster to hang on the wall in the second bedroom, at least until I've gotten more of the basics down. It's like the periodic table...all the scales and chord progressions and modes and everything are connected, and if you know how the connections work, you can work your way from one to any other without hesitation, and it gives you a vocabulary to describe what's going on musically in any given song. But my understanding is still very much on the fringes.

I'm not doing anything this weekend, but for Halloween night Brian and I have reservations at The Catcade - they're building a big blanket fort and showing The Nightmare Before Christmas, with drinks and cats. Sounds pretty perfect to me.

And off I go to yoga. Here's hoping we all have lovely cozy fall days ahead.
missroserose: (Incongruity)
Hello, book-friends! The Joffrey is putting on Giselle, which I've wanted to see literally since I was in the single digits. I inherited my mother's beautiful oversized book of illustrated ballet stories, with the most gorgeous art, done (I think?) in oils and in a sort of half-classical, half-Impressionist fashion; I remember the characters were portrayed in more naturalistic settings than they would have been onstage but still were always dancing, and the artist had a real gift for getting across that sense of movement, as well as heightened realism. (I remember wishing I could visit these places where dance seemed to be as natural a part of life as eating and sleeping. This probably also explains my love of musicals, heh.) It told the stories of several famous ballets, such as Petrushka and Swan Lake and Coppelia, but I always loved the fierce romanticism of Giselle. This is the last weekend for it, and between now and next Tuesday I have exactly one night - Thursday - when I'm not teaching or massaging or picking Brian up from the airport or something.

Guess who just bought a ticket for Thursday night? I may be tired this week, but dammit, I'll have my art.

What I've just finished reading

The Hummingbird's Daughter, by Luis Alberto Urrea. Finally finished this book, and I continue to have mixed feelings about it. I'd say the second half is far stronger than the first; there's more of a feeling of cause and effect, less of "things are happening because stuff just arbitrarily happens because it's God's will and/or we're all at the mercy of life/chance/politics/the elements/the universe and we just have to suffer through and get on with it". (That is pretty much the philosophy of Teresita's people, and while that's maybe not surprising - being a subjugated class living in squalor is unlikely to give anyone much sense of agency - it's more than a bit depressing to read about.) I really liked Don Tomás' arc, how he goes from being basically an overgrown boy playing at macho-ness into a man who cares for his family and his ranch; it reminded me of Steinbeck's Flight, in the scene where Pepé Torres' mother tells him he's not a man yet, because "a boy grows into a man when a man is needed." I could've done without the (luckily mostly implied) sexual assault on Teresita that causes her death (and eventual resurrection with healing superpowers); I don't know whether that was part of the historical record or artistic license, but seriously, isn't there another way for women in fiction to come into their powers? That said, I enjoyed the rising political tension in the last section, and the payoff - where Teresita defeats the distant President Díaz by forestalling the bloody battle he'd set her up to incite, purely by the power of her charisma and the belief of her people in her message of peace - was genuinely satisfying. I see that there's a sequel telling the story of her subsequent banishment to America; I'm tempted (you see so few stories of saints and holy people who actually get to have lives outside of their callings, especially with women!) but not sure I'm down for another four-hundred-plus pages right now.

Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life, by Ruth Franklin. This is a satisfyingly in-depth look at Jackson's life and works; I particularly like how the author ties together the themes that haunt her life and her stories and show how the effectiveness of her seemingly contradictory genre work (both psychological horror and lighthearted domestic humor, much to the puzzlement of many critics) came from the same wellspring of love, frustration, ambivalence, and repression. It's a little odd, then, that after hundreds of pages arguing that her abilities were far more varied than most critics seemed to grasp, Franklin walks it all back in the last couple of pages, putting Jackson precisely into the "horror writer" pigeonhole that Jackson herself loathed. Did she feel that Jackson's dual-classing made her ineligible for literary canonization? Similarly, while I realize a biography's going to end pretty soon after the subject's death, I would've liked a little more retrospective as to her effects on future writers, as well as maybe some more input from her children. The evidence Franklin presents heavily implies that she'd finally decided to leave her dysfunctional marriage when she died of a heart attack; it's more than a little tragic, but also strangely satisfying, as her children report she seemed oddly happy and at peace during her last few months. Still, after spending a lifetime under constant criticism from her mother and then her husband, I'm sad she never quite got the opportunity to see whom she would grow into on her own, without it. Perhaps the prospect was just too terrifying.

What I'm currently reading

Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones. I've seen the Miyazaki adaptation of this story a couple of times and quite enjoyed it, and although I've just started the book it's already cleared up a lot of questions I had about Sophie's state of mind at the start. In the film she comes across as weirdly complacent and unemotional, almost depressed - she talks about how she doesn't think she's pretty and how she's content to just sew hats in her shop, but that doesn't seem to account for her passivity. In the book, we learn that she's the eldest of three children in a fairytale land, and everyone knows it's unlucky to be born first of three - when you and your sisters set out to seek your fortune, you're bound to be rude to an old lady, or to miss the tinker's advice, or insult a wizard in disguise or make one of any number of other mistakes that can lead to all kinds of nasty outcomes. Given that weight of expectation, it's far less surprising that she'd prefer to meekly take the path laid out for her, sitting in her parents' shop sewing hats.

My Brilliant Friend, by Elena Ferrante. Elena and Lila are friends growing up on the outskirts of Naples in the 1950s (I think? the year isn't mentioned but at the start, when the women are grown, it mentions that Lila had become a computer whiz who started in the days of punch cards). They're pretty clearly underprivileged, Lila a little more so than Elena, but haven't quite figured that out yet; everyone around them (with the possible exception of the mysterious and menacing Don Achille) is poor, so they have no real basis for comparison. Elena is smart, but Lila is, as the title implies, brilliant; also rebellious, angry, and brash, but with flashes of compassion at the strangest times. Their relationship is an odd one; I dislike the trendy-teen-ness of "frenemy", but it does fit the way they seem to simultaneously bring out the best and the worst in each other. I'm not terribly far in but I am enjoying how skilled Ferrante is at evoking the heightened emotions of childhood, the acute pain of every small betrayal, and the lessons we have to learn surprisingly quickly.

What I plan to read next

Still eyeing Gaiman's Norse Mythology, although I'm eager to get to Ancillary Sword too - in my copious spare time (hah).
missroserose: (Book Love)
Hello, book friends! Last Friday I announced my intention to pursue music again and bought a piano, despite my historic ambivalence on the musical/performing front. And then while writing about that ambivalence here on DW, I hit a serious patch of Feels. Like, angry, ugly-crying, wanting-to-punch-something capital-F Feels. I don't get angry that often! It was disconcerting. Still, I had a good cry on Brian's shoulder and talked to a friend and wrote a lot of pages in my paper journal and felt better. I don't expect the path ahead to be smooth, but I'm hoping there'll be less resistance now, if that makes sense. Although I doubt that entry is going to ever see the light of day, haha.

Anyway, time for books!

What I've just finished reading

Nothing new this week - I'm working on finishing the good-size books I have going.

What I'm currently reading

The Hummingbird's Daughter, by Luis Alberto Urrea. I'm 80% through this tome, and some things have finally happened! Teresita has died and returned to life, is being venerated as a saint, and is preaching revolution to the Mexicans! These large-scale events are all interesting, but continue to be sketched entirely through small interpersonal vignettes that often seem to obfuscate as much as they illuminate (what exactly was Don Tomás' motivation in acknowledging her as his illegitimate daughter, pre-death? How is the rancho dealing with the sudden descent of thousands of pilgrims, and presumably the associated loss of much of their income? What precisely is it that the revolutionaries don't like about the current administration?). It feels more than a little bit like observing history through a single window - you see particular scenes in great and vivid detail, but any kind of broad-scale analysis is difficult if you don't already have the background knowledge of the time to give context. Which, given that I undertook this novel in the hopes of gaining some of that knowledge, is slightly frustrating. Still, the individual vignettes continue to be engaging; I particularly like how Teresita's relationship with her father (who's not previously been known for his respect for female intelligence) is evolving.

Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life, by Ruth Franklin. "The Lottery" might have put Jackson on the map as a storyteller, but with Life Among the Savages, her gently humorous account of domestic tribulations, she's become a bona fide bestseller - and not soon enough, given her large family's precarious financial and housing situation. While she anticipates this cushion giving her relief from her husband's constant henpecking about her work habits, I suspect his ambivalence in their relationship - enjoying and appreciating her financial success while feeling stymied and overshadowed in his own career, a particularly toxic combination for the mindset of the typically-socialized 1950s man - will only grow.

Ambivalence is definitely a theme in both their lives; Jackson enjoys cultivating an unusual and even outré image (decades before the Goth movement, she marketed herself as "the only currently publishing author who is also a practicing witch"), but the social penance she pays for her image is not small, especially in the tight-knit New England towns where she's already marked as an outsider. Having spent much of my school years in that same "I don't want to be part of your dumb ol' club anyway! (but it still hurts that I'm not)" space, I really feel her; we all have social needs, but what do you do when your immediate social environment is so hostile to your personal values? Perhaps it's not at all surprising that so many of her stories focus on socially alienated families in large houses, or that she and Stanley regularly hosted all-night parties with their New York writer friends (which only further aroused the curiousity and suspicions of their neighbors, in, the literary historian in me notes, a century-and-a-half-later echo of the suspicions of the local villagers of Byron and his crew). Perhaps Jackson's later somewhat infamous descent into agoraphobia is unsurprising, given the circumstances.

What I plan to read next

I'm determined to knock The Hummingbird's Daughter off this week, so I suspect that'll be a good chunk of my reading time. After that...hm. I picked up a copy of Neil Gaiman's Norse Mythology metanarrative from my neighborhood bookstore that I'm looking forward to. We'll see!
missroserose: (Kick Back & Read)
Hello, book friends! Today I went to Sculpt for the first time since traveling and recovering from a cold. (I hit a class last Saturday but realized ten minutes in that I was not recovered, and ended up sitting a good chunk of it out.) I was pleased to discover I could make it all the way through with minimal modifications; it's definitely tougher than it was three weeks ago but getting back to where I was shouldn't be too difficult of a climb. For the moment, though, I'm rather glad I don't need to raise my arms over my head anytime in the next several hours.


What I've just finished reading

The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England, by Ian Mortimer. Not a bad little trip, on the whole, although the criticisms about its sexist outlook are not without merit. Still, I learned a few things and laughed a few times, so on the whole I'll take it. I appreciated the picture sections with tapestries and manuscripts from the era; many of them I'd seen before, but it was cool to examine the fashions and art styles and whatnot just after reading about them.

The Ruin of a Rake, by Cat Sebastian. I've read a few of Sebastian's romances now, and unfortunately, all three have come up basically...not-quite. The dialogue feels not-quite-natural, the characters don't quite spring off the page, the chemistry never quite clicks. Which is a shame, because her setting and her plot both work beautifully. But especially with romance and especially-especially with sex, the interest is in how the characters get from civilized-and-guarded-with-defenses-firmly-in-place to primal-and-intimate-and-terrifyingly-open. And I don't think she's quite mastered that segue yet.

What I'm currently reading

The Hummingbird's Daughter, by Luis Alberto Urrea. I'm having an interesting relationship with this one. When I think about it objectively, I feel like not a lot is happening, so I end up drifting off to this or that new book...but then I finish that book, pick this one back up again, and am immediately absorbed in its colorful depiction of late-nineteenth-century Mexican life. So I can't say I'm not enjoying it, but I'm really wondering where it's all going, or if it's actually just a 528-page vignette.

What I plan to read next

I'm thinking it's time I pulled up Google Translate and Bara roligt i Bullerbyn - I got bogged down about 2/3rds through and never got around to finishing it. But man, it's hard to read in a second language - I'm so used to being able to look at a paragraph and pick up its meaning almost effortlessly, so having to work it out word by word is humbling. I know learning to read English was hard, because my mother tells me that I struggled with it, but I wanted to be able to read books for myself so badly that I was strongly motivated. But I don't remember any of that - I literally can't remember a time when I couldn't read. So the exercise in humility is probably good for me, heh.
missroserose: (Inspire)
As I mentioned before, I very much loved Ancillary Justice, in part because of the multilayered approach - the story works very well on its own, but there are a lot of Big Ideas addressed both overtly and subtly, and so many crunchy questions of ethics and morality and technology and culture to debate. The aspect that caught my eye the most, though, was how a little over midway through the book, it also became a parable about identity.

Spoilers ahoy! )

I recently came across a wonderful metaphor for consciousness in (of all things) Come As You Are. Nagoski describes our minds as being like a flock of birds - at any given time you have your ideals, your assumptions, your values, your emotions, your opinions of the world, the information given to you by your senses, your feelings about that information, your memories, all flying at once. When they're all in harmony with each other - when they're all on a level and all agree with each other about which direction to fly - all is well. When some are in disagreement, however - when past actions disagree with your values, or when you receive new information that's at odds with your assumptions of how the world operates - this causes cognitive dissonance, which can be uncomfortable enough to eventually alter our values and thus the direction of the entire flock. In extreme cases, where traumatic events take place and our flock goes all over the place, we end up paralyzed. But most of the time, it's not that extreme; we continue on, and eventually resolve the dissonance by changing what we can -
whether that's our behavior or our beliefs.

But how often have we accidentally entrapped our friends within that dissonance? How often have we, in not wanting to address our own shortcomings, put those we care most about in a no-win situation? I think particularly of romantic relationships, because they're so emotionally fraught and full of scenarios where our feelings don't live up to our values. Say a partner breaks up with us; we believe that they're an individual and have the right to pursue their own happiness, so we do our best to keep our chin up and bravely soldier on. But breakups hurt; social disconnection hits at our very core sense of self-worth (not to mention our more primal fears of survival, as social connection is fundamental to that survival). Then some weeks later - long enough for us to have gotten over the worst of the sting, but nowhere near long enough to have recovered entirely - someone we care about approaches us and tells us they've been wanting to see our former partner romantically, and is that okay with us? We're faced with a dilemma - no, emotionally it's not okay with us, but to say so means admitting our humanity and our vulnerability on this point, not to mention demonstrating that we're not living up to our vision of ourselves as someone able to Get Over Things. So we say that it's quite all right, thus setting our friend up for precisely this kind of failure - if they take us out our word, we resent them and possibly lash out at them later; if they don't, they're as good as saying they don't trust us. Either way, disconnection.

I think this is one of the biggest reasons I find teaching yoga so rewarding. My emotional integrity has improved by leaps and bounds since I began practicing regularly; something about the meditative aspects of yoga really helps me acknowledge and be more compassionate towards the parts of my consciousness that don't align with who I most want to be, and the physical activity helps to defuse the stronger emotion and get that part of me flying in line with the rest of the birds. I hope that, to some extent, I share that same feeling with my students; it's the kind of small-scale change that can have a huge effect in a person's life, and perhaps even ripple out to have positive effects on everyone around them.
missroserose: (Kick Back & Read)
I'm back from Alaska, and managed to meet my goal of making it through an entire visit with my mother without getting into a flaming row. Hooray for active listening!  Or perhaps we just got the row out of the way beforehand, heh.  On the less-good side, someone in my home state was kind enough to share a cold with me, which I'm still fighting off...and I have two classes to teach tonight. I suspect tonight's focus will be self-directed practice, heh.


What I've just finished reading

An Unsuitable Heir, by KJ Charles. What makes a long flight home with a cold bearable? Pseudoephedrine and a new KJ Charles romance. The former sort of tunnels my awareness, making me tend to hyper-focus on one thing rather than be aware of my surroundings, but in coach class that's not necessarily a bad thing (although I did almost miss the beverage cart a couple of times). And the story of Pen and Mark - a nonbinary Victorian era circus performer suddenly heir to an unwanted earldom, and a one-armed private investigator with a pragmatic outlook and catholic tastes - was a delightful thing to focus upon. The book also finishes the Sins of the Cities plot arc, which is pure Victorian serial melodrama, but elevated by Charles' usual excellent characterization, and given some interesting twists by Pen's nonstandard self-image. I also loved Pen's relationship with twin sister Greta; there are really too few supportive sibling relationships in the fiction I read.


What I'm currently reading

The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England, by Ian Mortimer. This book continues to be a fascinating refinement of my perceptions of fourteenth-century England. There haven't been many outright revelations - I've read a fair amount of fiction set in the period, beginning with Karen Cushman's work in elementary school (Catherine, Called Birdy was always a favorite). But there are some minor details I hadn't realized - for instance, while personal cleanliness is more difficult prospect than it is now and standards for cleanliness are somewhat different (a healthy body odor is thought to be a sign of virility, at least among the lower classes), people still wash their hands and face when they get up in the morning, and handwashing is mandatory before and after meals. Most personal washing is done in basins, and thus somewhat more sporadically than we'd consider ideal (especially in the freezing winters), but especially among the more prosperous tradesmen and the nobility, it's considered bad form to go around stinking up the place, so people make do. Household cleanliness is made difficult both by the lack of good detergents and of labor-saving devices, but that doesn't mean it's neglected; cleanliness (or the appearance thereof) is closely linked to purity of spirit, and is thus highly valued in religious medieval England. So perhaps my grousing about how everyone in Galavant looks a little too clean is somewhat misguided.

Another point brought up that I found interesting was that of ignorance vs. misinformation, specifically as regards the medical profession of the time. Physicians were not ignorant; medieval medical texts were chock-full of 'knowledge' on treating illness. Unfortunately, since much of that knowledge came from flawed sources (astrology, humoral theory, superstition, hearsay, a little practical experience with no scientific method applied), it tended to be less-than-helpful at best. It does give you an idea of why Enlightenment principles had something of an uphill battle before them; it's much harder to convince people to change their outlook when there's already an established worldview.

Also, I'm quoting this passage in full, because it made me laugh. From the end of chapter 8, on the perils of taking hospitality in monasteries:

There is an old traveling minstrels' trick which you might want to keep up your sleeve. How guests are treated in a monastery is the decision of the almoner {man in charge of distributing alms}. If he treats you badly, or serves you the most miserly portions of food, or if you get given "a vile and hard bed", go to the abbot and praise him to the skies for the generosity of his house, and emphasize the large amount of money which the almoner must have laid out on your behalf.

My lord, I thank you and your worthy convent for the great cheer I have had here, and of the great cost I have taken of you; for your good liberal monk, your almoner, served me yester evening at my supper worthily, with many divers costly messes of fish, and I drank passing good wine.  And now I am going he has given me a new pair of boots, and a good pair of new knives, and a new belt.

The abbot will have little choice but to take such thanks at face value and bask in the fictitious glory.  But have no doubt:  the almoner will have a lot of explaining to do later.

 
As an aside, one of the interesting things about learning Swedish has been the ways in which the construction sometimes resembles medieval speech - the verb is nearly always placed second in the sentence (Hur mår du i kväll?, translates most directly to "How fare you this evening?"); and certain words such as passande (which translates to "suitable" or "appropriate") were used in nearly the same form in medieval English (such as here, in "passing good", which to modern ears sounds like "mediocre" but in fact means "quite excellent").  The language tree is passing fascinating!


What I plan to read next

I need to finish The Hummingbird's Daughter, even though Cat Sebastian's Ruin of a Rake is beckoning me on my Kindle - reformed bad-boy enemies-to-lovers gay Regency romance that won numerous awards?  Did somebody say "catnip"?

missroserose: (Book Love)
Hello, Anchorage! I'm visiting my home state again, and currently running on five hours of sleep, a 30-minute nap I managed to catch this afternoon, and enough coffee and tea to (luckily briefly) spike my blood pressure and kick my adrenals into overdrive. The crash is coming, oh yes, and it will be hard.

But first, before I run out of Wednesday - books!

What I just finished reading

The Sundial, by Shirley Jackson. I found the ending of this one almost anticlimactic. It certainly didn't feel like it added much to what I've already written about this book - things play out precisely as you would expect if you've been paying attention. But I'm beginning to suspect that's typical of Jackson's writing; she's fond of setting up the dominoes of personality and dysfunction and environment and outside circumstance and watching them tip against each other. I did like where the story ended, with our little cultist family right on the cusp of the supposed apocalypse - does the world actually end? Do the characters inherit the renewed earth as they've been promised? Does it turn out to be a metaphorical renewal rather than a literal one? Or, as the last scene hints, is it a literal renewal that turns out to be just as troubled by our cultists' inherent shortcomings and interpersonal dysfunction as the former world? It's left to the reader, and perhaps to the characters, to decide.

Ancillary Justice, by Ann Leckie. Holy Jesus, I loved this book. I had expected it to be something of an investment, if not an outright slog, to get into - I enjoy second-world fantasy and sci-fi, but find myself with less and less patience for the "And now I'm going to spend the next eighty pages describing exactly how magic works in this particular universe" style of worldbuilding these days - but I found it surprisingly engrossing; Leckie could teach a master class on "show, don't tell". I loved all the observed quirks about linguistics and translation, such as the way that the poetry/songs, even when explicitly described as rhyming, don't rhyme in transcription - because of course they wouldn't, we're reading them in English, not whatever language they're from. I loved the concept of a single consciousness split into multiple bodies, what can happen when things don't go as expected, and how that past perspective would inform a given single body cut off from the greater consciousness. (I have a whole page scribbled down in my journal on Justice as a parable for identity, and the importance of maintaining self-honesty and integrity in dealing with others so that we don't entrap them in our conflicting selves; I'm hoping to flesh it out into a blog post later, when I have more brains.) I loved the detail in the varying cultures and their respective sociology. I loved the character arcs - Breq and Seivarden, two very damaged and isolated people, both relearning who they are and where they might fit in the greater picture. I have so many thoughts and they're all kind of scattered, but I'm sure I'll write more about them - there's two more books, after all.

What I'm currently reading

Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life, by Ruth Franklin. Having graduated and gotten married despite the protestations of their families and the greater culture (in 1940s America it was still unusual for a Jew and a non-Jew to marry), Shirley Jackson and Stanley Hyman are living in bohemian poverty in Grenwich Village, scraping by as they try to get their foot in the door of the literary scene. I particularly appreciate Franklin's unsparing assessment of their relationship - you can really see the ways in which they complement each other positively (Stanley's editorial eye for Shirley's work and his constant encouragement of her to try new things artistically, as well as his ability to challenge her intellect in a way few men can) and negatively (Shirley's deep and fundamental insecurity, in part due to her mother's constant rejection of her, that leaves her open to Stanley's criticism and constant philandering). Having read a number of pieces about F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald claiming that Zelda ruined Scott's life or vice versa, I find myself wondering if this was what their relationship had been like two decades earlier - at its best, intensely creative and inspiring, and at its worst, hitting each other's complementary insecurities so hard as to be mutually destructive.

The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England, by Ian Mortimer. I realize in retrospect that "just having finished a book" was maybe a rather vulnerable time to go visit one of my favorite used bookstores - I was looking for a specific book and also ended up picking this one off the shelf. In my defense, it's fascinating - an intentionally-accessibly-written history of England throughout the fifteenth century, written intentionally in present tense to give a sense of what it might have been like to live in that era. I'm only a little ways in, but so far I'm enjoying it - if nothing else, it'll give me specifics to carp about next time I'm at the Bristol Renaissance Faire. Because everyone loves the period nitpicker, haha.

What I plan to read next

Ancillary Sword is high on the list for the next paper book. On the audiobook front, having read [personal profile] osprey_archer's glowing reviews of Elena Ferrante's Neapolitan quartet, I was tickled to see My Brilliant Friend on Audible Daily Deal for $5. Sold!

Profile

missroserose: (Default)
Ambrosia

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 04:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios