Caution: Frank talk about girly bits ahead. I'm not putting this under a cut because I think it's ridiculous and frankly sexist that much of the population has been socialized to be squicked out by discussion of the perfectly normal biological functioning of bits that half the population owns. However, if you're a victim of such conditioning, or a lawmaker from Michigan, you may want to skip the following. (And if any of said MI lawmakers drop by and want to protest that they weren't being sexist, name me one instance of a dude making a flippant comment about his penis that got him barred from speaking in a debate relating to penile health. Just one. I'm waiting.)
I woke up this morning with a brief ache in my upper left arm, where my Implanon birth control implant sits. Nothing serious, but enough to make me palpate the area and make sure nothing was amiss. When I pressed it, however, and didn't feel the implant there, I realized that the ache was where the implant had been placed when I first got it nearly three years ago, and not where it's migrated to (further down the arm) since then. Definitely a relief that nothing was wrong, but perhaps also a psychosomatic indication of my increasing distrust of its stability.
For two and a half years it's been great, but the past six months or so have been mood-swing city (on and off rather than continual, fortunately, or else I probably would've got rid of it far earlier). I'm due for removal in October, although I'm probably going to go in sooner than that; mostly I'm just waiting for our insurance cards. And while I could get another implant if I wanted to, I don't think I'm going to go that route, especially since there's an IUD with the same hormonal aspects that only costs a little more and lasts for five years instead of three.
I'm feeling kind of ambivalent about hormones in general, though. Unlike many women I know, I've had a pretty positive relationship with hormonal birth control in the past. My periods tend to be on the heavier side with a goodly dose of cramping; not enough to be disabling or anything, but definitely in the "moderately miserable" category. However, since discovering that low-dose birth control pills reduced them to occasional spotting (when it didn't stop them altogether), I've been on one form or another of the stuff pretty much continually for nearly a decade. And this is the first time I've ever had mood swings like this, which leads me to believe it's probably a function of the implant nearing the end of its life cycle.
Thing is, it has been nearly a decade, and I'm not the same person physically that I was then. I'm probably pretty similar, but there have definitely been hormonal changes in the interim - multiple orgasms, anyone? So I'm a little hesitant to immediately jump on board with another hormonal birth control method; it seems like it would be better to give it a few months and see if I feel better or worse without the constant dosage of chemicals.
On the other hand, I really, really like the convenience of the implant - no pills to take or barriers to futz with, just set it and go. There's a nonhormonal IUD that I could try, but [a] it's expensive enough that I'd rather not get it unless I was planning to stick with it, and [b] it's been known to cause heavier bleeding and cramps in some women; not exactly a resounding recommendation. Sterilization's an option, but for women it's expensive enough that I'd ultimately rather go with an IUD, especially if I decide I still want the hormones. (Plus, while I've never had a bad reaction to anesthesia that I know of, something about it just freaks me out a bit.) So that leaves the usual suspects for the proposed interim - condoms, diaphragm, sponges, et al. I might look into a diaphragm; it sounds like a bit of a pain, but it's inexpensive enough to work as a temporary nonhormonal option, and I've never minded mucking about with my vagina. (See above re: multiple orgasms. :)
So now I'm opening the floor - is there another option I'm not considering? What's your history with birth control (from either sex's perspective)? I'm well aware that no one method is perfect for everyone, but I'm interested in hearing about other folks' experiences.
I woke up this morning with a brief ache in my upper left arm, where my Implanon birth control implant sits. Nothing serious, but enough to make me palpate the area and make sure nothing was amiss. When I pressed it, however, and didn't feel the implant there, I realized that the ache was where the implant had been placed when I first got it nearly three years ago, and not where it's migrated to (further down the arm) since then. Definitely a relief that nothing was wrong, but perhaps also a psychosomatic indication of my increasing distrust of its stability.
For two and a half years it's been great, but the past six months or so have been mood-swing city (on and off rather than continual, fortunately, or else I probably would've got rid of it far earlier). I'm due for removal in October, although I'm probably going to go in sooner than that; mostly I'm just waiting for our insurance cards. And while I could get another implant if I wanted to, I don't think I'm going to go that route, especially since there's an IUD with the same hormonal aspects that only costs a little more and lasts for five years instead of three.
I'm feeling kind of ambivalent about hormones in general, though. Unlike many women I know, I've had a pretty positive relationship with hormonal birth control in the past. My periods tend to be on the heavier side with a goodly dose of cramping; not enough to be disabling or anything, but definitely in the "moderately miserable" category. However, since discovering that low-dose birth control pills reduced them to occasional spotting (when it didn't stop them altogether), I've been on one form or another of the stuff pretty much continually for nearly a decade. And this is the first time I've ever had mood swings like this, which leads me to believe it's probably a function of the implant nearing the end of its life cycle.
Thing is, it has been nearly a decade, and I'm not the same person physically that I was then. I'm probably pretty similar, but there have definitely been hormonal changes in the interim - multiple orgasms, anyone? So I'm a little hesitant to immediately jump on board with another hormonal birth control method; it seems like it would be better to give it a few months and see if I feel better or worse without the constant dosage of chemicals.
On the other hand, I really, really like the convenience of the implant - no pills to take or barriers to futz with, just set it and go. There's a nonhormonal IUD that I could try, but [a] it's expensive enough that I'd rather not get it unless I was planning to stick with it, and [b] it's been known to cause heavier bleeding and cramps in some women; not exactly a resounding recommendation. Sterilization's an option, but for women it's expensive enough that I'd ultimately rather go with an IUD, especially if I decide I still want the hormones. (Plus, while I've never had a bad reaction to anesthesia that I know of, something about it just freaks me out a bit.) So that leaves the usual suspects for the proposed interim - condoms, diaphragm, sponges, et al. I might look into a diaphragm; it sounds like a bit of a pain, but it's inexpensive enough to work as a temporary nonhormonal option, and I've never minded mucking about with my vagina. (See above re: multiple orgasms. :)
So now I'm opening the floor - is there another option I'm not considering? What's your history with birth control (from either sex's perspective)? I'm well aware that no one method is perfect for everyone, but I'm interested in hearing about other folks' experiences.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 09:20 am (UTC)I have a non-hormonal IUD. I don't think I've had much heavier bleeding, maybe some cramps but nothing that a couple of acetaminophen won't fix. They last 10 years nowadays, so if you can find the cash from somewhere, it is well worth it!
I tried a diaphragm but I can't say I'd recommend it, save that it will hold back your blood flow if you want to do it when you're menstruating. I found it was uncomfortable to put in and then there tends to be a bit of a taste and smell of spermicide around your nethers even if you wash, so oral sex as foreplay is probably off the menu. One thing they don't tell you is that the smell when you take it out (I think you have to leave it in a couple of hours afterwards at least...) can be rather overpowering.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 02:40 pm (UTC)The IUD's definitely going to be something I investigate if I decide I don't want hormones in the long term. Planned Parenthood's website says that the one that's available in the US lasts up to 12 years, actually, so that definitely seems like the best cost/benefit ratio. Fortunately Brian's got a good job with insurance that actually covers birth control (unlike my supposedly-great insurance when I worked for the County and got Implanon three years ago...cripes, I'm still pissed off about that), so cost is a factor (there's still the copay and deductible to consider) but not a huge one.
Thanks for the info on the diaphragm! I hadn't heard any stories of firsthand experiences, so that's good to know. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 03:51 pm (UTC)If Brian's insurance covers birth control (prior to being forced to do so), then it would probably cover sterilization for either of you as well.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-13 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-14 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 05:12 pm (UTC)I had a bad experience with the Paragard and don't recommend it unless the woman is super wealthy and can afford to lose the cost if it doesn't work for her. Some bcp's gave me migraines - Yaz was the WORST. I tried Nuvaring for a while and it worked well. If I were going to go back on the hormones, the ring is what I'd do again.
But honestly? Vasectomy FTW. Best decision ever in our household.
L.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 06:16 pm (UTC)I tried the ring once when they had a special for a free month's supply, and I did like it, but the $45-a-month cost ended up being a little much for me to swallow on a college-student budget.
What happened with the Paraguard, if you don't mind my asking?
no subject
Date: 2012-08-12 12:11 am (UTC)I thought I was just weird, but I have another close friend here in Virginia who had the Paragard for six months and had the exact same thing happen.
I've heard it works absolutely great for some people, but given my experience and that of my friend, I feel like anyone who puts it in should be prepared for it not to work for her. And given the cost, it's a rather expensive experiment.
L.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-12 04:22 am (UTC)There's definitely some trial-and-error involved. Insurance helps, though.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 10:31 pm (UTC)I like the idea of your experiment on yourself. No telling what it could do, good or bad, and it's intellectually interesting to discover such things as well as potentially beneficial.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-11 11:42 pm (UTC)When it comes to physiology especially, I'm a big believer in "there's no one right answer". Everyone's a little different and reacts differently to different medications, and that can change as they grow and change as well. So it only makes sense to experiment on myself and see what works. :)
Mum's the Word
Date: 2012-08-12 06:50 am (UTC)