missroserose: (Default)
[personal profile] missroserose
Spent the day on jury duty, waiting to see if I'm going to serve on the jury for an actually pretty high-profile case (for Juneau, anyway). I'm not going to say anything about the trial itself, obviously, but geez - performing jury service is even more hurry-up-and-wait than I imagined. I'm glad I had Jane Eyre with me. It was an interesting experience, though, even if it did mean a day of missed work and a rescheduled appointment, and even if by the end of the day I still didn't know if I was going to be selected. (I should know by tomorrow afternoon, though.)

The first disc of Heroes came in from Netflix, four days late, and Brian and I spent the evening watching the first several episodes (Disc 2 arrived on time and sat on our coffee table for a while by its lonesome). Given the series' admitted comic-book origins, I'm surprised at how grim and suspenseful it is. Don't get me wrong, it's very well done, just...skewed rather more toward the darker end of the storytelling spectrum than I was expecting. It's good that they have Hiro's character in the mix, I think - he provides some much-needed comic relief, as well as providing an example that we can hope the others follow. As Brian put it, "He's the only one who's using his powers for awesome." Hopefully his idealism will rub off some on the other characters - I think they'll be a lot more likable once they actually become, well, heroes.

Date: 2008-07-15 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joyfulleigh.livejournal.com
I absolutely LOVED the first season of Heroes. The second season, aside from being too short because of the damn writers' strike, was a little less compelling. I'm hoping when it eventually starts back up that they'll pull me back in with the same level of awesomeness as the first season.

I wish I lived in Alaska so I could watch it with you! (Or, more accurately, I wish you could come visit me in Virginia and bring the movies with you so that we could watch movies AND take you shopping for some decent work clothes.) :)

L.

Date: 2008-07-16 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roseneko.livejournal.com
*laughs* Much as I'd love the trip, I'm not sure my finances could take it right now, so I'll have to take a rain check. (Or is it rein check? I've never quite been certain...) I'll be sure to keep you updated once Netflix gets us the next couple of discs. :)

Date: 2008-07-15 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joyfulleigh.livejournal.com
Oh, and I LOVED jury duty! I got on a trial when I was 18. Everyone else was all grumpy and bummed about being there but it was summer and I had nothing else going on at the time, so I was totally psyched. I got to be the foreman! It was a cocaine trial and even though the guy was totally guilty, the prosecution didn't make their case so we let him off. I'd do jury duty again in a heartbeat. It makes me feel all Law and Order or something, like maybe I'll get to see Ice T or Sam Waterson. I'm a dork. Truly.

L.

Date: 2008-07-16 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roseneko.livejournal.com
*laughs* That does sound pretty cool. I enjoyed the experience myself, although it would've been a bit more convenient if I hadn't had to reschedule that interview. Interestingly enough, mine was a cocaine case too; some dude here in town that they were trying to set up as a "drug kingpin" (like you'd ever see one of those in Juneau). The prosecution ended up excusing me; I think it was because, when he was questioning me, I answered with firm conviction rather than going along with whatever he suggested. (Advantage to growing up with an attorney for a mother - you learn how to circumvent all their tricks.)

One of the things that made me wince, though: One of the potential jurors was an older woman who had both a juris doctorate degree and a decade's worth of experience in social work; she probably would have been the best-qualified of any of us to judge the proceedings, as she'd have a very good idea of both the legal and social-harm aspects. So, of course, she was the third person to be excused. >< When I told my mum about that, she said that attorneys will often excused the most experienced/qualified people, because the other jurors during deliberation will defer to their experience and thus skew the result, and obviously an attorney's going to have a harder time convincing someone who actually has a background in the issue at hand than someone who doesn't know anything about it.

Date: 2008-07-15 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flewellyn.livejournal.com
So that's where you were!

Profile

missroserose: (Default)
Ambrosia

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 03:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios