Review: Little Brother, by Cory Doctorow
Jul. 31st, 2013 08:46 pmNeil Gaiman, whose tact and talent for double-edged diplomacy I've often admired, has a blurb listed at the start of this book. "It made me want to be thirteen again right now and reading it for the first time."
And really, that kind of sums it up. This is not a complex book. It is a political call-to-arms, a rallying cry for free speech and free exchange of information, which is just as relevant now (in the Snowden and "what does the NSA actually mean when they say" era) as it is was in the immediately post-9/11 environment in which it was so obviously written. The good guys are average folks, the bad guys are all working for the federal government to spy on (and capture and torture and curtail the freedoms of) the good guys, everyone over twenty-five years old is buying into the system to stay feeling safe, and it's up to the scrappy young kids to both prove that the surveillance is doing no such thing and to turn public opinion against the federal government and its endemic human rights abuses.
That's pretty much it. No shades of grey, no characters who are misguided but honestly trying to help, no situations where the question of the right thing to do is murky at best. In that sense, it's a very adolescent-feeling story. Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with a bit of escapism now and then; and as escapism goes, this is decently written - informative, snappily paced, satisfying. And politically speaking I'm very much in Doctorow's camp; I don't like how people react when they get scared, I don't like seeing others take advantage of that fear to grab power for themselves, and I strongly mistrust anyone who thinks the solution to a breach of security is the revoking of civil liberties. (I mean, one of my all-time favorite movies is V for Vendetta, fer chrissakes.)
But...this particular narrative was frustrating to me. Because I also strongly mistrust anyone who's utterly certain of the rightness of their position, who never even thinks to question it. The story's complete unwillingness to even acknowledge that there might be a middle ground, that its manifestos might not always be absolute, that people were either good guys or bad, therefore, was enough to turn me off of it somewhat. And then the author went and staged one of my least favorite rhetorical tricks: Hey, let's write the main character into a political debate with a cartoon strawman, and make the kid the mouthpiece for everything right and good in the world! Wow, all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, there, Doctorow.
So, to my somewhat wry amusement, I find myself agreeing wholeheartedly with Mr. Gaiman. If I were thirteen, or sixteen, or even twenty, I would probably have loved this book; at thirty, it's just too simplistic for me to really get behind. The book tells us not to trust anyone over twenty-five, and perhaps that's true; perhaps we "old" folks have a more nuanced viewpoint that's only slowing you young firebrands down. But I hope that as those young firebrands get older and acquire a little more life experience, they'll understand that singleminded belief can be exploited just as easily as fear can - perhaps even more easily. And that when they reach that point, it'll be up to them and their own judgment to decide on the right way forward. C-
And really, that kind of sums it up. This is not a complex book. It is a political call-to-arms, a rallying cry for free speech and free exchange of information, which is just as relevant now (in the Snowden and "what does the NSA actually mean when they say" era) as it is was in the immediately post-9/11 environment in which it was so obviously written. The good guys are average folks, the bad guys are all working for the federal government to spy on (and capture and torture and curtail the freedoms of) the good guys, everyone over twenty-five years old is buying into the system to stay feeling safe, and it's up to the scrappy young kids to both prove that the surveillance is doing no such thing and to turn public opinion against the federal government and its endemic human rights abuses.
That's pretty much it. No shades of grey, no characters who are misguided but honestly trying to help, no situations where the question of the right thing to do is murky at best. In that sense, it's a very adolescent-feeling story. Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with a bit of escapism now and then; and as escapism goes, this is decently written - informative, snappily paced, satisfying. And politically speaking I'm very much in Doctorow's camp; I don't like how people react when they get scared, I don't like seeing others take advantage of that fear to grab power for themselves, and I strongly mistrust anyone who thinks the solution to a breach of security is the revoking of civil liberties. (I mean, one of my all-time favorite movies is V for Vendetta, fer chrissakes.)
But...this particular narrative was frustrating to me. Because I also strongly mistrust anyone who's utterly certain of the rightness of their position, who never even thinks to question it. The story's complete unwillingness to even acknowledge that there might be a middle ground, that its manifestos might not always be absolute, that people were either good guys or bad, therefore, was enough to turn me off of it somewhat. And then the author went and staged one of my least favorite rhetorical tricks: Hey, let's write the main character into a political debate with a cartoon strawman, and make the kid the mouthpiece for everything right and good in the world! Wow, all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, there, Doctorow.
So, to my somewhat wry amusement, I find myself agreeing wholeheartedly with Mr. Gaiman. If I were thirteen, or sixteen, or even twenty, I would probably have loved this book; at thirty, it's just too simplistic for me to really get behind. The book tells us not to trust anyone over twenty-five, and perhaps that's true; perhaps we "old" folks have a more nuanced viewpoint that's only slowing you young firebrands down. But I hope that as those young firebrands get older and acquire a little more life experience, they'll understand that singleminded belief can be exploited just as easily as fear can - perhaps even more easily. And that when they reach that point, it'll be up to them and their own judgment to decide on the right way forward. C-