missroserose: (Default)
Ambrosia ([personal profile] missroserose) wrote2009-08-24 06:40 am
Entry tags:

Insurance news

The good, or at least less-sucky: Between getting married and Brian turning 25 over the last year, our auto insurance has gone down almost $250 per six-month premium. So that's nice, even if it's still a mandatory large expenditure. Sigh.

The wince-inducingly awful: Word is the health insurance industry as a whole is rejoicing - not only is it looking like healthcare reform as a whole is going to bring them millions of new customers (including government subsidized lower-income people), but the one bargaining chip the government had planned in order to keep them from taking complete and total advantage of their customers (the creation of a public option to compete with the private sector) is losing support, and there's talk of only requiring them to cover 65% of costs on cheaper plans. Jesus H. Christ on a cracker. I didn't honestly think things could be any worse than they are, but pass this "reform" and the poorer folk are going to be even more screwed - not to mention the taxpayers who'll be subsidizing their worthless "plans". But the insurance industry gets richer, so everybody who matters wins!

As a sidenote - I particularly love this bit: "In the first half of 2009, the health service and HMO sector spent nearly $35 million lobbying Congress, the White House and federal healthcare offices, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics." And how much of that $35 million came from/is going to be offset by denying paying customers' claims for bullshit reasons, thus sticking them with even more bills?

I dunno about you guys, but I'm headed straight to the city of Headdesk in the great, time-honored land of Political Demoralization. Anyone else want to come along?

[identity profile] amanda_lodden.livejournal.com 2009-08-24 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Welcome to the What-Are-Those-Fuckers-Thinking-ville. Do you need a ride from the airport? I can pick you up.

[identity profile] roseneko.livejournal.com 2009-08-24 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Sadly, I'm not even wondering what it is they were thinking - it's not hard to guess at all, if you follow the money. I guess I was just halfway hoping they'd actually have the greater good of their constituents in mind, rather than the greater good of their campaign funds. *sigh* Somebody needs to start the Good of the People lobby, and soon. If only we could find some way to make the Greater Good profitable...