Ambrosia (
missroserose) wrote2009-08-24 06:40 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Insurance news
The good, or at least less-sucky: Between getting married and Brian turning 25 over the last year, our auto insurance has gone down almost $250 per six-month premium. So that's nice, even if it's still a mandatory large expenditure. Sigh.
The wince-inducingly awful: Word is the health insurance industry as a whole is rejoicing - not only is it looking like healthcare reform as a whole is going to bring them millions of new customers (including government subsidized lower-income people), but the one bargaining chip the government had planned in order to keep them from taking complete and total advantage of their customers (the creation of a public option to compete with the private sector) is losing support, and there's talk of only requiring them to cover 65% of costs on cheaper plans. Jesus H. Christ on a cracker. I didn't honestly think things could be any worse than they are, but pass this "reform" and the poorer folk are going to be even more screwed - not to mention the taxpayers who'll be subsidizing their worthless "plans". But the insurance industry gets richer, so everybody who matters wins!
As a sidenote - I particularly love this bit: "In the first half of 2009, the health service and HMO sector spent nearly $35 million lobbying Congress, the White House and federal healthcare offices, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics." And how much of that $35 million came from/is going to be offset by denying paying customers' claims for bullshit reasons, thus sticking them with even more bills?
I dunno about you guys, but I'm headed straight to the city of Headdesk in the great, time-honored land of Political Demoralization. Anyone else want to come along?
The wince-inducingly awful: Word is the health insurance industry as a whole is rejoicing - not only is it looking like healthcare reform as a whole is going to bring them millions of new customers (including government subsidized lower-income people), but the one bargaining chip the government had planned in order to keep them from taking complete and total advantage of their customers (the creation of a public option to compete with the private sector) is losing support, and there's talk of only requiring them to cover 65% of costs on cheaper plans. Jesus H. Christ on a cracker. I didn't honestly think things could be any worse than they are, but pass this "reform" and the poorer folk are going to be even more screwed - not to mention the taxpayers who'll be subsidizing their worthless "plans". But the insurance industry gets richer, so everybody who matters wins!
As a sidenote - I particularly love this bit: "In the first half of 2009, the health service and HMO sector spent nearly $35 million lobbying Congress, the White House and federal healthcare offices, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics." And how much of that $35 million came from/is going to be offset by denying paying customers' claims for bullshit reasons, thus sticking them with even more bills?
I dunno about you guys, but I'm headed straight to the city of Headdesk in the great, time-honored land of Political Demoralization. Anyone else want to come along?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have got to get married. I think the government needs to legalise same-self marriages because I'm tired of being discriminated against.
I'm headed straight to the city of Headdesk in the great, time-honored land of Political Demoralization.
You mean Kommunist Kanada, with its evil socialised medicine? *sigh* I would once again like to put in a request for a opposition party. Spine mandatory.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-08-24 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Responsiblity for Health
You will still need doctors occasionally, as you might need a lawyer occasionally, but you break the "doctor, drugs, dependency" cycle that keeps so many people sick. Personally, I would rather focus on taking responsiblity for my own condition, than deploring those who don't. Frustration and Despair are both conditions where one abdicates power - you can literally feel your energy drain away into the vast sea of helplessness.
Turn your attention to things you can do something about and your energy renews! This is the power of putting yourself in a position of being cause. Good health is a product of being willing to confront a situation and find or create a way to be at cause where your energy grows, rather than allowing yourself to be at effect where your energy drains away.
Doctors love folks on "energy drain" they seldom see the other kind! Think about it. Your power to confront and take responsiblity for yourself - rather than abdicate power to the doctor, the government or the insurance company - is a direct indication of your level of mental, and thus, physical health. That's where you begin. Take it on a gradual rising scale and someday, my Darlin' Daughter, you will be the leader of a tremendous grass roots movement of people who decided to get well in spite of everything! This is how I see it. Love, Mum
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Incidentally, the option I like most is to have health insurance companies that are non-profit, member-owned institutions, kind of like credit unions, with similar membership "requirements". (In Utah, the requirement for most credit unions is just that you live in a certain county, or even that you live in the state of Utah.) But I haven't heard this discussed as an option so, whatever.
*Where they are a competitor but also set the rules for the marketplace, and can also partially fund themselves with tax money, there won't be any real competition, and when the private companies go out of business all we'll be left with will be shitty government run health insurance options. But I'm sure you've heard this argument before and have some reason for thinking it won't happen this way or thinking that it wouldn't be bad if it did.
no subject
I have heard that argument, and I agree that it's not a perfect system. As I recall, the original plan put income limits on the public option, so if you earned more than a certain amount of money you had to either go with an employer-funded or privately-bought plan. But even without that, I tend to think of it as the lesser of two evils, and given the record profits they're making, I think the insurance companies have a lot of leeway before they're in any danger of going out of business.
no subject